IOSG Founding Partner: The Pump.fun public sale seems more like the team seeking liquidity exit, with the project and market fundamentals unable to support the inflated valuation.
BlockBeats News, July 10th, IOSG Founding Partner Jocy posted on social media, stating that he believes this Pump.fun public sale is more like using participants as exit liquidity, constituting a highly speculative gamble.
Jocy stated that since its launch in early 2024, Pump.fun has experienced explosive growth, with a cumulative protocol revenue of about $7 billion, becoming one of the most profitable projects in the cryptocurrency field. However, Pump.fun's daily revenue has dropped by 92% from its peak, currently standing at only about $500,000. The project's market cap has plummeted from tens of millions of dollars in the past to a rock-bottom $50,000 to $100,000. Its market share has also been surpassed by a competitor, LetsBonk (with a 51% share), causing Pump.fun to fall to 39.9%.
From a tokenomics and risk exposure perspective, this ICO round targeted retail investors (15%) and institutions (18%), selling a total of 33% of the tokens, corresponding to a funding amount of $1.32 billion. Considering past fee revenues, the http://Pump.fun team will hold nearly $2 billion in cash. This poses an extremely unfriendly risk exposure to public investors:
· Lack of transparent governance structure: Decision-making process is a mystery
· Team/Investor release terms are opaque
· Overvalued financing has overdrawn future growth potential
Jocy stated that he believes the Pump.fun team has neither the intention nor the ability to "pump" or "control" the price. They have already amassed a huge fortune through fees, and this ICO is more like a final "value realization" (Exit Liquidity). In the current market environment with severely insufficient buying pressure, such a high valuation simply cannot be sustained. This is completely different from Hyperliquid's valuation support logic. Jocy believes that this market public fundraising is a highly speculative gamble, not a fundamental investment. The funds invested should be risk capital that can be completely lost. The market's enthusiasm for meme launch platforms and shitcoins has shown signs of fatigue. Investors are advised to wait for the token to trade on the open market for a week before making a decision, observing the true market response.
You may also like

Three years later: Looking back at my judgment of ChatGPT in 2023

From Casino Tools to Global Pricing Machines: The NYSE Leader's Perspective on Hyperliquid

A Detailed Analysis of "Stock God Serenity" Investment Methodology

Sharplink CEO: The future of Ethereum is unfolding

Morning Report | Korea Investment & Securities and OKX plan to jointly acquire 40% of Coinone; Polymarket denies implementing KYC comprehensively; Grayscale delays U.S. stock IPO plans

Bit Digital CEO: Why I Bought More ETH

A Decade of Three Waves of Stock Tokenization from Bitget's Reality: An Unfinished Financial Exploration

"Hu Run Baifu" Dialogue with Sun Yuchen: A New Paradigm of Value Circulation in the Web3 Transformation Cycle

Is it hackers and regulation that ruined DeFi?

Chris Lee: From crypto OG to heavy investments in the three storage giants, predictions on AI bull market corrections, Web4, and opportunities for the younger generation

Ready for a Walk on the Wilder Side of Proof of Talk 2026? Join WEEX Labs in Paris

Gold vs Bitcoin in 2026: Which Market Is Giving Traders Better Opportunities?

Morning News | Coinbase partners with Standard Chartered Bank to expand multi-currency fiat channels; Sharplink and Forward will be included in the Russell Index; JPMorgan may issue stablecoins in the future

Hash Global Founder: Why I Also Chose to Liquidate All My ETH?

Tokenized US Stock Duel: Ondo vs. xStocks, Who is Defining On-Chain Nasdaq?

He Yideng ranked: Since you're here, you might as well

The era of regulatory arbitrage has come to an end, and the value of cryptocurrency exchange licenses is being fiercely contested

