L1 is dead, Appchain should rise

By: rootdata|2026/04/20 12:12:49
0
Share
copy

Author: iwillpat

Compiled by: Jiahua, ChainCatcher

Since the era of "Rollup as a Service" (RaaS) began, the outcome has already been determined. This is a precursor to the execution layer falling into a death spiral and commoditization.

What I mean is that general-purpose L1 tokens will continue to trend towards zero, and possibly without exception. I will try to explain the reasons, and how I would pivot if I were an L1 operator.

The main drivers of L1 failure are as follows: linear token release, failed value propositions, poor management, and the industry's "leadership."

I will briefly elaborate on these points—these are just personal opinions, not conclusions.

The current form of linear staking release has some benefits, namely distribution through liquid staking ("My 7% annualized!"), but it has failed in several key areas.

Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) makes it easy for the "decentralization purists" who talk a big game to participate in network security, but it does not properly incentivize insiders, users, and developers. At best, it only incentivizes people to hold tokens, which does nothing to create any actual value.

I have heard the classic argument about PoS: large validators have economic incentives not to dump on you. But that hasn't stopped them from selling every possible unlock amount and block reward.

This leads to my next point: they sell because L1 tokens have no long-term value proposition.

A "Tissue" That Breaks with a Poke

The arguments about "Gas tokens" and "governance" are old and unconvincing—like two Bounty tissues that fall apart with a single poke. The value of network tokens depends on what you can buy with them.

Therefore, the goal of all blockchain teams should be to promote their tokens as widely as possible for circulation as currency. In the pursuit of higher TPS and lower block times, the industry's vision of "peer-to-peer electronic cash" seems to have been lost.

To put it bluntly: throughput, TVL, and low latency do not give tokens any value. Liquidity and usage do.

The next point is the most practical and painful: blockchain "labs." (And various foundations.)

Dumping tokens after the lock-up period, off-market trades at huge discounts, jaw-dropping operational expenses, incentive programs to attract hot money, hiring "KOLs"... we can all name a few.

Ultimately, every penny spent by Labs is a tax levied on token holders. Unless the Labs generate revenue through some service, first-party wallet, or application, they are surviving by selling tokens.

This is not necessarily a bad thing—they provide valuable services through engineering resources, browsers, and APIs. But if Labs do not bring net new buying pressure to the tokens, and spending continues to rise unsustainably, they will slowly bleed to death.

One of the primary goals

You may also like

The midlife crisis of Crypto GP: Without PMF, there is no next check from LP

After losing the vastness of the stars and the sea, most Crypto GPs that failed to earn excess returns in this cycle must pragmatically launch a product with PMF, either by proving their ability to help LPs earn excess returns through some niche market, or by solving specific problems for LPs/partne...

Why is Peter Thiel, behind Palantir, preparing an exit in Argentina?

Palantir, political risk, and the self-preservation of technological oligarchs.

The broken defense of Solana's guardians: In order to tear apart Hyperliquid, they actually picked up the script that Ethereum once criticized itself?

HYPE surge sparks a battle of giants. Solana's leader angrily criticizes Hyperliquid for being too centralized, while Arthur Hayes counters with a strong rebuttal, betting $100,000.

Interview with macro master Raoul Pal: The AI competition is giving rise to an "economic singularity," don't easily give up your chips in the next four years

Compared to Nasdaq, Bitcoin is currently in a severely oversold position within its long-term trend.

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times his investment in storage stocks? (Six) - The Trap of Homogeneous Products

In-depth analysis of the cyclical curse of storage stocks: The short-term windfall brought by AI is unsustainable, and rigid capacity will ultimately backfire on prices. Beware of the "low price-to-earnings ratio" wealth trap at the cyclical peak.

"Trapped in the cryptocurrency world: Don't let the anxiety of missing out force you onto the most dangerous last train."

When global assets reach new highs, cryptocurrency becomes the only uninvited guest.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more
iconiconiconiconiconiconicon
Customer Support:@weikecs
Business Cooperation:@weikecs
Quant Trading & MM:bd@weex.com
VIP Program:support@weex.com