The biggest DeFi heist of 2026, hackers easily took advantage of Aave

By: rootdata|2026/04/19 09:12:22
0
Share
copy

Author: Xiao Bing, Shenchao TechFlow

On the evening of April 18 at 17:35 (UTC), a wallet that had laundered money through Tornado Cash sent a cross-chain message to the LayerZero EndpointV2 contract.

The message's meaning was simple: a user on a certain chain wanted to transfer rsETH back to the Ethereum mainnet. LayerZero faithfully conveyed the instruction according to the protocol design. The bridging contract deployed by Kelp DAO on the mainnet also executed the release faithfully as designed.

116,500 rsETH, worth approximately $292 million at the time, was transferred in a single transaction to an address controlled by the attacker.

The problem is that no one on the other chain had ever deposited this rsETH. This "cross-chain request" was fabricated out of thin air; LayerZero believed it, and Kelp's bridge believed it.

Forty-six minutes later, Kelp's emergency multi-signature finally hit the pause button. By this time, the attacker had already completed the latter half of the action, using the stolen, essentially uncollateralized rsETH to collateralize in Aave V3, borrowing approximately $236 million worth of wETH.

This is the largest DeFi theft of 2026 so far, surpassing the Drift protocol, which was attacked by North Korean hackers on April 1 by several million dollars, but what truly sends chills down the spine of the industry is not just the amount.

How the Attack Happened: Three Bets from 17:35 to 18:28

Let's restore the timeline.

17:35 UTC, the first success. The attacker called the lzReceive function on the LayerZero EndpointV2 contract, and a wallet funded by Tornado Cash sent a fabricated cross-chain data packet to Kelp's bridging contract. The contract verification passed, and 116,500 rsETH was released to the attacker's address. A single transaction. Clean.

18:21 UTC, Kelp's emergency pause multi-signature froze the core rsETH contracts on the mainnet and multiple L2s. 46 minutes after the attack occurred.

18:26 and 18:28 UTC, the attacker initiated two more attempts, each time attempting to withdraw 40,000 rsETH (approximately $10 million) with a LayerZero data packet. Both were reverted; the contract had already been frozen, but the attacker was clearly still trying to siphon off the remaining liquidity.

From the first success to Kelp's public statement, nearly three hours elapsed.

Kelp's first X post was not sent until 20:10 UTC, and the wording was very restrained: suspicious cross-chain activity involving rsETH was detected, the rsETH contracts on the mainnet and multiple L2s had been paused, and they were collaborating with LayerZero, Unichain, auditors, and external security experts for root cause analysis.

However, earlier than the official statement, ZachXBT, an on-chain detective, raised the alarm in his Telegram channel before 3 PM Eastern Time, listing six wallet addresses related to the theft and pointing out that the attack wallet had prepared funds through Tornado Cash before starting its actions. He did not name Kelp DAO, but on-chain analysts connected the addresses in just a few hours.

This was a **premeditated operation executed

You may also like

Fidelity Mid-Year Review: 6 Key Trends in Digital Assets for 2026

Setting aside short-term market fluctuations, the underlying logic of digital assets is changing. The accelerated integration of capital markets, the implementation of regulatory frameworks, and the continuous optimization of infrastructure constitute the core driving forces of current industry deve...

The midlife crisis of Crypto GP: Without PMF, there is no next check from LP

After losing the vastness of the stars and the sea, most Crypto GPs that failed to earn excess returns in this cycle must pragmatically launch a product with PMF, either by proving their ability to help LPs earn excess returns through some niche market, or by solving specific problems for LPs/partne...

Why is Peter Thiel, behind Palantir, preparing an exit in Argentina?

Palantir, political risk, and the self-preservation of technological oligarchs.

The broken defense of Solana's guardians: In order to tear apart Hyperliquid, they actually picked up the script that Ethereum once criticized itself?

HYPE surge sparks a battle of giants. Solana's leader angrily criticizes Hyperliquid for being too centralized, while Arthur Hayes counters with a strong rebuttal, betting $100,000.

Interview with macro master Raoul Pal: The AI competition is giving rise to an "economic singularity," don't easily give up your chips in the next four years

Compared to Nasdaq, Bitcoin is currently in a severely oversold position within its long-term trend.

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times his investment in storage stocks? (Six) - The Trap of Homogeneous Products

In-depth analysis of the cyclical curse of storage stocks: The short-term windfall brought by AI is unsustainable, and rigid capacity will ultimately backfire on prices. Beware of the "low price-to-earnings ratio" wealth trap at the cyclical peak.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more
iconiconiconiconiconiconicon
Customer Support:@weikecs
Business Cooperation:@weikecs
Quant Trading & MM:bd@weex.com
VIP Program:support@weex.com